11 Greenhouse alternatives for efficient recruiting in 2026

Greenhouse is a powerful applicant tracking system (ATS) applauded for its deep customization and support for high-volume, multi-region recruiting. It also scales well as hiring volume and team complexity increase.

The downside though? All that flexibility comes at the cost of a steep learning curve with setup, tool adaptation, and integrations taking significant time.

“Some routine operations [also] require a lot of clicking around, which slows down usage with a high number of applicants to process,” writes a Greenhouse user.

These are the main reasons teams evaluating ATS platforms compare Greenhouse alternatives. So if you’re looking for an easier-to-use hiring software that also supports complex recruiting — without the long setup time — you’re in the right place.

In this guide, we compare 11 powerful Greenhouse alternatives as we review their ease of use, feature depth, configurability, and scalability — all backed by user reviews.

Whether you’re choosing your first recruiting platform or replacing Greenhouse, you’ll leave knowing which tools will best meet your hiring needs. 

What is Greenhouse and who is it right for? (And when it isn’t.)

Greenhouse is a specialized, end-to-end applicant tracking system that supports high-volume recruiting. It’s designed to handle complex hiring flows with features like bulk candidate management, automated stage transitions, and structured interview workflows.

It’s also a highly customizable platform, which makes it appealing for mid-market teams with mature hiring processes. However, that flexibility comes with a tradeoff: longer setup time and a steep learning curve.

Other common Greenhouse shortcomings users report include:

• Limited reporting features: Greenhouse users note, “reporting capabilities feel less intuitive and robust [limiting] the ability to perform comprehensive data analytics effectively.”
• Integration issues: Integrations can require “a lot of clunky admin work to set up.” Integrations with HR tools can particularly feel lacking.
• Cluttered UI: Although several teams share Greenhouse is intuitive, some also note that certain screens “look a little cluttered.”

Greenhouse ATS key features

• Customizable hiring pipelines: Define role-specific hiring stages in a visual, drag-and-drop pipeline, move candidates between stages, and standardize workflows to keep hiring structured and transparent.
• Access controls and role-based permissions: Create tailored workflows and set role-based permissions so teams only see the candidates and stages relevant to them.
• Interview kits and scorecards: Run structured interviews using preparation kits, role-specific questions, and evaluation scorecards.
• Real-time analytics: Choose from 40+ customizable report templates covering pipeline health, time-to-hire, and diversity tracking, or build custom reports from scratch to support your hiring goals.
• Candidate experience tools: Provide candidates with an application portal to apply, receive automated updates and reminders, set up job alerts, and book interviews on their own schedule.
• Integrations: Connect with 500+ apps and sync candidate and employee data with your HR system using Greenhouse’s HRIS Link. Greenhouse does not offer a built-in HRIS module.

Greenhouse pros and cons

Greenhouse scales well for structured, high-volume recruiting, but it isn’t the easiest ATS to adopt or customize — especially when it comes to reporting and integrations. Here’s a quick rundown of Greenhouse’s strengths and shortcomings:

Greenhouse vs ATS alternatives: Comparison table (2026)

Get a quick overview of how Greenhouse compares to different applicant tracking systems. Click on the image below to access the entire document!

11 best Greenhouse alternatives for efficient recruiting in 2026

ATS tools broadly fall under two categories: 

• Standalone ATS platforms that integrate with your HR tool and help with complex hiring needs.
• ATS add-on modules built into HR tools that offer basic recruiting features to meet simple hiring needs.

In this guide, we cover both types of ATS as Greenhouse alternatives. You’ll also find standalone ATS that aren’t as complex as Greenhouse, in case you don’t use an HR suite yet and need a simpler alternative. 

 1. Tellent Recruitee

Tellent Recruitee is a highly customizable, end-to-end applicant tracking system for teams hiring across multiple locations and departments in industries such as tech, corporate services, manufacturing, healthcare, and finance.

Key features

• Talent pools: Build and manage talent pools to track potential candidates for future roles. Add candidates manually or using the Chrome extension, assign owners, follow updates, and filter by source, rating, or status.
• Advanced workflow automations: Build custom workflows using triggers, actions, and conditions to automate tasks, stage movements, emails, tagging, evaluations, and candidate disqualification. Trigger actions outside the candidate pipeline (such as publishing jobs or syncing to HRIS) and run omnichannel automations across emails, notes, tasks, tags, and notifications to reduce manual work.
• Pre-built and custom reporting: Choose from 90+ customizable reporting modules such as candidate overview and pipeline insights, or build custom dashboards to track real-time hiring metrics and share up-to-date insights with your team.
• Collaboration tools: Create unlimited user profiles, assign tasks by pipeline stage, and use shared candidate notes and structured evaluation forms to support fast, collaborative hiring decisions.
• Proactive, local customer support: Work with regional support teams across Europe that understand local labor laws, compliance requirements, and market nuances, and respond in your language and working hour.
• Integrations: Connect with 200+ tools, including integrations with calendar, email, and HRIS tools, and a native WhatsApp integration to speed up hiring.

Greenhouse vs Tellent Recruitee

Both Greenhouse and Tellent Recruitee are full-featured, standalone ATS platforms built to support high-volume recruiting. Both are also highly customizable and can scale with growing teams.

Where they start to differ is in ease of use, implementation effort, and customer support:

• Ease of use

Tellent Recruitee is generally easier to use than Greenhouse. Some users describe Greenhouse as challenging to navigate, while Tellent Recruitee users highlight, “It’s visual aesthetic and streamlined pipelines set it above the rest in terms of user friendliness.”

• Implementation and learning curve

Greenhouse’s setup tends to be more involved, with a steeper learning curve. One user shares, “Some features can feel a bit complex at first, especially when setting up custom workflows or reports.” In contrast, Tellent Recruitee’s setup doesn’t take as long, and users share “it’s straight to the point.” 

• Free trial

Greenhouse doesn’t offer a free trial, but Tellent Recruitee offers an 18-day free trial so you can review the software before committing.

• HRIS integrations and modular HRIS

Both platforms integrate with major HR tools. However, some users report Greenhouse integrations aren’t as seamless. Tellent Recruite also offers an HRIS module (Tellent HR) for teams that prefer managing recruiting and HR in one system.

• Customer support

Greenhouse’s support is primarily US-based, which may affect response windows for international teams. Tellent Recruitee offers localized support across Europe, with teams that understand local compliance requirements and respond during your working hours.

2. Personio 

Personio is an all-in-one HR suite that includes a basic recruiting module, Personio Recruiting, to manage hiring alongside core HR processes in one workspace.

Key features

• Applicant tracking: Manage candidate applications in one inbox, create custom recruiting stages, assign roles, and track statuses.
• Basic automations: Automate candidate screening, interview scheduling, and reminders to reduce repeat work.
• Candidate experience tools: Enable mobile-friendly applications, collect electronic signatures, and share feedback directly with candidates throughout the hiring process.
• Integrations: Integrate with 200+ apps. WhatsApp is not supported natively, but you can use third-party tools like Zapier to set up a workaround. 

​​Want to read more about Personio alternatives? Check out our list

Greenhouse vs Personio

Where Greenhouse is a standalone, specialized ATS, Personio Recruiting is a basic recruiting module inside a broader HR platform. 

That difference shapes who each tool is for, how powerful the recruiting features are, and how complex implementation tends to be:

• Who they’re for

Greenhouse is built for mid-sized and enterprise teams running high-volume hiring. Personio Recruiting is better suited to SMBs already using Personio as their HR system and running simpler hiring processes.

• Recruiting features

Greenhouse supports complex recruiting with tools like bulk candidate management and advanced automation for multi-region hiring. In contrast, Personio offers lighter recruiting functionality with basic automations and limited customization — enough for low-volume hiring, but not for scale.

• Ease of use and implementation

Personio is generally easier to use and faster to implement, though users report occasional performance issues. Greenhouse, while more powerful, takes longer to configure and learn. Its depth comes with a steeper learning curve, especially during setup and workflow customization.

If you’re looking for something in between — robust but easier to adopt with faster implementation — ATS tools like Tellent Recruitee or Lever may be a better fit.

3. Workable

Workable is an intuitive HR and hiring platform that unifies simple recruiting workflows and everyday HR tasks in one platform.

Key features

• Customizable applicant tracking pipeline: Customize hiring stages and automate tasks and candidate communication to improve hiring efficiency. 
• Passive candidate database and AI recommendations: Search, filter, and use AI recommendations to find qualified candidates from Workable’s database of 400 million profiles.
• Employee referral program: Set up an internal job board with automatic notifications, simple referral submissions, social sharing tools, and a gamified rewards system. Track referral status, manage bonuses, and generate reports from a central dashboard.
• Candidate evaluation tools: Review applications anonymously by hiding candidate-identifying details, use AI-generated summaries with match scores, and standardize interviews with custom interview kits and scorecards.
• Collaboration tools: Create and share candidate profiles with hiring team members to prepare for interviews and exchange feedback, and manage confidentiality with role-based access and permissions.
• Integrations: Connect with 270+ tools, including onboarding platforms, background check services, and candidate assessment software. 

Greenhouse vs Workable

Greenhouse is a standalone, end-to-end recruiting software, whereas Workable is an all-in-one HR tool with built-in recruiting features — leading to differences in use cases, feature depth, and scalability between the two:

• Who they’re for

Greenhouse is best suited for mid-market teams running high-volume or global hiring. As one user puts it, Greenhouse is “best for an environment that hires a lot.” Workable, in contrast, is better for small teams that want to combine basic recruiting and HR in one simpler, more affordable tool.

• Feature depth

Greenhouse offers deeper customization, advanced automations, and richer reporting for complex hiring workflows. Workable focuses on simpler recruiting workflows built for ease of use rather than workflow complexity.

• Scalability

Greenhouse is designed to scale with hiring volume and process complexity. In contrast, Workable works well for smaller teams but feels limiting as hiring needs grow more advanced or geographically distributed. 

4. BambooHR

BambooHR is an HR platform that offers a built-in simple ATS designed to support simple, low-volume hiring.

Key features

• Collaborative hiring: Collaborate with your team using in-system messaging, custom permissions, and automatic alerts.
• Candidate communication tools: Create customizable job posts and offer letter templates, collect electronic signatures, and send personalized emails to candidates at each stage of the hiring process.
• Basic hiring analytics: Track applicant sources with the Candidate Sources report and identify bottlenecks with the Candidate Funnel report to optimize your hiring workflow.
• Basic mobile app: Access the platform on the go with a simple mobile app. Users note the app is easy to use but limited for admin-level tasks such as approvals, reporting, and editing employee records.
• Integrations: Connect with 150+ apps, including background check tools like Checkr and specialized ATS software like Tellent Recruitee and Greenhouse. 

Greenhouse vs BambooHR

Greenhouse is a standalone ATS built for mature, high-volume recruiting. BambooHR, by contrast, is a broader HRIS platform with a built-in ATS module. This difference in product focus shapes everything from feature depth to scalability:

• Who they’re for

Greenhouse is better suited for mid-market and enterprise teams running high-volume, multi-region hiring. BambooHR is a stronger fit for teams that want an HR-first platform with simple recruiting built in, especially for low-volume hiring requirements.

• Analytics and customization

Greenhouse offers in-depth analytics and deep customization, which support advanced workflows but can also increase setup time and complexity. In comparison, BambooHR offers basic reporting and simpler customization, making it easier to use but less flexible for complex hiring needs.

• Integrations

Greenhouse gives you 600+ integrations, including integrations with HR tools like BambooHR, whereas BambooHR gives you 150+ integrations.

5. Lever

Like Greenhouse, Lever is a mid-market ATS with built-in Candidate Relationship Management (CRM) functionality designed to support mid- to high-volume hiring.

 Key features

• Customizable workflows and automation: Tailor forms and approval tokens, build custom internal approval processes, and streamline tasks with candidate self-scheduling, bulk actions, and smart suggestions.
• Talent CRM & candidate nurturing: Build and maintain candidate pipelines using integrated CRM tools, tag and filter talent, and run automated nurture campaigns to engage passive candidates for future roles.
• In-depth analytics: Build role-based dashboards to track individual candidates, diversity metrics, and ROI indicators such as time-to-hire and source effectiveness.
• Integrations: Connect Lever with 300+ apps and export recruiting data to business intelligence tools using its Data Warehouse Sync. 

Greenhouse vs Lever

Both Greenhouse and Lever are standalone ATS built for growing teams. Where they differ is in the depth of customization they offer, pricing, and their onboarding capabilities:

• Customization

Greenhouse offers deeper customization — even as setup can be complex, and some reviews report certain workflows may fail to trigger. Lever, by comparison, is easier to configure. Its automations are simpler and faster to set up, but not as extensible as Greenhouse’s for highly customized hiring processes.

• Pricing

Greenhouse generally sits at the higher end of the mid-market ATS category. Vendr estimates Greenhouse costs $32K for 150 employees for a year, and Lever Enterprise stands at $22K for 230 employees for a year. 

Pricing models also vary. Greenhouse offers a tiered pricing structure. In comparison, Lever’s pricing scales by the number of your full-time employees, plus add-on costs for API access, career site builders, candidate texting, and advanced analytics.

• Pre-onboarding and onboarding capability

Greenhouse lets you create a personalized, automated new hire experience — something that Lever doesn’t offer (although Greenhouse ATS alternatives like Tellent Recruitee do). 

6. Jobvite 

Jobvite is a standalone ATS built to support structured, scalable recruiting operations.

Key features

• Candidate 360-degree profiles: Create a complete profile for every candidate, including their application history and past interactions.
• Collaboration features: Use customizable dashboards, workflows, and an internal communication portal to collect feedback and collaborate across teams.
• Interview scheduling: Share multiple time options with candidates and interviewers using the smart scheduler to finalize interviews quickly.
• Customizable workflows: Build role-, department-, and location-specific workflows to standardize recruiting and onboarding across the business.
• Candidate relationship management (CRM) tools: Build and segment talent pools to nurture both active and future candidates with multi-channel outreach (email, text, and social), and run targeted campaigns to support ongoing candidate engagement.

Greenhouse vs Jobvite 

Both Greenhouse and Jobvite are standalone ATS software for mid-market teams with steeper learning curves. Their main differences show up in implementation time, automation depth, and pricing structure:

• Implementation

Both platforms require long implementation timelines, but Jobvite generally takes more time to set up. G2 reviews indicate Jobvite implementations average around three months, while Greenhouse setups take closer to two months.

• Automation

Users rate Greenhouse higher for advanced automation workflows — with Greenhouse scoring 7.9 and Jobvite scoring 7.

• Pricing

Greenhouse uses a tiered pricing model based on plan level and features. Jobvite, by contrast, offers a core platform that includes its ATS, CRM, and analytics capabilities, with optional add-on modules such as AI Companion, video interviewing, and onboarding. While this allows teams to tailor their setup, adding multiple modules can increase total cost depending on the features you choose.

7. BreezyHR

BreezyHR is a simple ATS that offers basic recruiting features and configurability — suitable for small teams. A separate performance management module is also available as an add-on.

Key features

• Job board posting: Publish open roles automatically to free and paid job boards using built-in job description templates.
• Centralized candidate management: Track all candidate communication, feedback, and hiring progress in one place, with every interaction stored in each candidate’s profile.
• Customizable candidate pipeline: Build a custom hiring pipeline using the drag-and-drop interface and automate stage actions to move qualified applicants along the hiring journey.
• AI recruiting tools: Use Breezy HR’s AI add-on called Breezy Intelligence to parse resumes, evaluate candidates, and generate interaction summaries.
• Basic automation: Automate repetitive tasks such as pre-screening candidates, emails, interview scheduling, and feedback collection.
• Career pages and job widget: Create branded, mobile-optimized career pages or embed a live list of open roles on your website using the Breezy Widget.
• Integrations: Connect with background check tools, personality assessments, offer management systems, and HR platforms to fit your existing tech stack. 

Greenhouse vs BreezyHR

While both Greenhouse and BreezyHR are standalone ATS platforms, Greenhouse is a more mature recruiting software compared to BreezyHR, which is a basic software. 

This difference is apparent in the types of teams they cater to, their implementation, and scalability:

• Who they’re for

Greenhouse is for large companies with complex hiring processes. BreezyHR is for startups and small businesses looking for an affordable, intuitive ATS for their basic hiring needs.

• Ease of use and implementation 

Greenhouse takes longer to implement and configure, and some users report the interface can feel cluttered. BreezyHR is generally easier to use, with faster setup and a simpler interface suited to teams without dedicated recruiting operations.

• Scalability

Greenhouse is highly customizable with advanced automation, making it scalable for growing teams. BreezyHR, on the other hand, is a simple recruiting software, so it feels limiting as hiring volume and workflow complexity increase.

8. SmartRecruiters

SmartRecruiters is an enterprise-grade applicant tracking software with separate CRM, analytics, and onboarding modules to support multi-region hiring.

Key features

• Interview scheduling and team collaboration: Schedule interviews automatically, share interview kits, use structured scorecards, and collect real-time feedback from hiring teams.
• Candidate relationship management tools: Build and nurture talent pipelines using engagement campaigns, talent pools, and automated outreach sequences.
• Custom workflows and user permissions: Create configurable, multi-step hiring workflows with role-based permissions and tailored user roles.
• AI-powered sourcing and matching: Use AI to find qualified candidates, parse CVs, rank applications, and surface best-fit profiles based on job requirements and past hiring data.
• End-to-end recruiting analytics: Track real-time performance with dashboards and custom reports across sourcing, pipeline health, hiring velocity, and recruiter productivity.

• Integrations: Connect with 600+ job boards, HR systems, assessment tools, background check services, and candidate sourcing platforms through SmartRecruiters’ marketplace. 

Greenhouse vs SmartRecruiters

Greenhouse and SmartRecruiters are both enterprise-grade recruiting platforms built for high-volume hiring. Both also offer advanced ATS functionality alongside optional CRM, analytics, and onboarding modules.

Where they differ most is in usability, feature emphasis, and cost structure:

• Ease of use

Greenhouse has mixed reviews around usability. SmartRecruiters is generally described as easier to navigate, with a cleaner interface and less training required for hiring teams.

• Recruiting features

Both platforms support large-scale recruiting with automation and workflows. However, user reviews suggest SmartRecruiters is stronger in applicant tracking, while Greenhouse’s reporting features are comparatively more robust.

• Pricing

Per Vendr estimates, both mid-market ATS platforms cost in the same range, with the average user investing $32K per year in Greenhouse and $33K per year in SmartRecruiters on average.

9. JazzHR

JazzHR is a simple applicant tracking system designed to streamline hiring for small teams.

Key features

• Collaborative hiring: Share notes and feedback with your hiring team so everyone can review candidates and comment directly on their profiles.
• Workflow automation: Set up email triggers and assign tasks as candidates move through hiring stages.
• Candidate texting (add-on): Message candidates directly from the platform to speed up communication.
• Structured interviews and assessment tools: Schedule interviews, use predefined interview questions, and score candidates with built-in evaluation tools to standardize candidate evaluations.

Greenhouse vs JazzHR

Greenhouse is built for complex, high-volume recruiting, while JazzHR is designed for simpler hiring needs. This difference in scope shows up clearly in feature depth, pricing, and day-to-day usability: 

• Recruiting features

Greenhouse offers advanced automation and deep customization for high-volume hiring. JazzHR focuses on essentials such as resume parsing, basic reporting, and interview scheduling — better suited to straightforward hiring workflows.

• Pricing

Greenhouse uses custom, quote-based pricing tied to team size and feature requirements. JazzHR offers public, lower-entry pricing (starting at $75 per month for companies with up to 250 employees), making it more accessible for smaller teams. 

• Mobile app

Greenhouse offers a mobile app — especially useful for teams that hire on the move such as retail, logistics, and healthcare. JazzHR does not currently offer a mobile app.

10. Rippling Recruiting

Rippling Recruiting is an add-on ATS module inside Rippling’s broader HR platform that connects hiring with HR, IT, and finance in one system.

Key features

• Candidate experience tools: Send text messages from inside Rippling, personalize outreach with email templates, and let candidates self-schedule interviews based on real-time interviewer availability.
• Automated recruiting workflows: Build workflows that trigger actions across your hiring process, including paying referral bonuses, assigning backup interviewers, and sending stage-based communications to candidates.
• AI recruiting tools: Use AI to summarize recorded interviews, combine insights from multiple scorecards, and surface key takeaways to help recruiters compare candidates faster.
• Advanced permissions and role-based access: Create permission profiles by team, level, or role so recruiters, hiring managers, and interviewers only access the candidates, stages, and data relevant to them.
• Integrations: Connect with 600+ tools across your tech stack. 

Greenhouse vs Rippling Recruiting

Where Greenhouse is a specialized applicant tracking software, Rippling Recruiting is an applicant tracking module inside a broader HR tool, Rippling.

With its advanced permission access and workflow automation, Rippling Recruiting is more powerful than other HR tools’ basic recruiting modules. But it still doesn’t offer the depth or flexibility of a dedicated ATS.

With that, the main differences between Greenhouse and Rippling Recruiting are:

• Who they’re for

Greenhouse is for teams running high-volume, multi-stakeholder hiring. Rippling Recruiting is for Rippling users who have the resources to manage IT, finance, HR, and hiring in one platform.

• Ease of use

User reviews generally describe the Rippling platform as easier to use than Greenhouse. If you’re a Rippling user, implementing its recruiting module won’t take as much time and training as it’d implementing Greenhouse but will come at the cost of limited customization comparatively.

• Scalability

Greenhouse scales well as hiring becomes more complex, supporting deeper workflows and automation. Rippling Recruiting is flexible within Rippling’s ecosystem, but many teams eventually pair it with a purpose-built ATS as hiring volume and requirements grow.

11. Deel Talent

Deel Talent is Deel’s new recruiting module designed to help their users manage hiring within the same global payroll and Employer of Record (EOR) platform.

Key features

• Global talent network: Leverage Deel’s network of recruitment partners that source candidates across multiple industries and regions.
• Basic hiring visibility: Track recruiting partner performance using agency dashboards that show applicant volume, time-to-hire, spend, and time saved.
• Background checks: Screen candidates globally using Deel’s Background Checks add-on, covering 190+ countries.
• Payroll, payments, and compliance: Run international payroll in multiple currencies, automate payments, and manage worker classification, contracts, taxes, and new-hire compliance through Deel’s global payroll and Employer of Record (EOR) infrastructure. 

Greenhouse vs Deel Talent

Greenhouse is a specialized ATS, whereas Deel Talent is a relatively new recruiting module inside Deel’s broader payroll platform. As a result, the two tools serve very different hiring needs:

• Who they’re for

Greenhouse helps mid-market organizations managing high-volume recruiting in-house. Deel Talent is best suited for Deel customers who rely on recruiting agencies and want a simple way to manage job requests and agency workflows inside the same platform as payroll and compliance.

• Ease of use

Deel is generally an intuitive platform, whereas Greenhouse users report, “it’s not unhelpful, it’s just huge, and it takes a long time to learn.”

• Scalability

Deel Talent is only useful as long as SMBs have simple hiring requirements. But the more advanced customization they need, the more they’ll find that a specialized ATS can help them better automate recruiting processes and reduce time to hire. 

Factors to consider when choosing an applicant tracking system

Whether you’re selecting your first applicant tracking software or switching from your current ATS, start off by understanding what your hiring looks like today and where it’s heading.

The factors below help you evaluate both your internal hiring needs and the external capabilities you’ll need from an ATS. Use them as a checklist to find an ATS that can support your workflows now and adapt as they grow more complex:

1. Hiring needs and volume 

Is your hiring simple (one recruiter, linear workflow) or complex (multiple teams, multi-stage approvals, high applicant flow)? How many roles do you hire per month, and how will that change over the next 12–18 months?

• Geographic scope

Are you hiring in one country or across multiple regions with different compliance requirements, languages, and recruiting workflows?

• Customization needs

How much flexibility do you need across hiring pipelines, automations and triggers, templates, and evaluation workflows? How well can the ATS adapt to your process or force you into its own?

• Workflow complexity

Can the ATS support your unique hiring processes, interview processes, stakeholder involvement, and decision workflows?

• Automation depth

Do you need simple stage-based automation or more advanced logic like condition-based triggers, cross-pipeline actions, automatic disqualification rules, and HRIS syncing workflows?

• Reporting and analytics 

Does the ATS offer basic hiring reports or real-time dashboards, role-level insights, and custom reporting? Can you track hiring velocity, source effectiveness, and bottlenecks without exporting everything to spreadsheets?

• Scalability

Will the ATS still work when your team doubles, hiring volume increases, and your workflows become more structured?

• Integrations 

Is the ATS compatible with your HRIS, job boards, and sourcing tools, email, calendar, communication tools, and the rest of your tech stack?

• Collaboration tools

How does the ATS support team collaborate, task assignment, provide feedback, and ensure visibility across hiring managers and interviewers?

• Local compliance and support

If you hire internationally, ask how well the ATS supports GDPR and local labor law compliance.  

• Ease of use and implementation speed 

How long does onboarding take? And does adapting the tool require extensive training and admin support, or can teams self-serve?

• Budget and pricing model 

How will costs scale based on hiring volume, number of employees, feature requirements, or modules and add-ons?

So, is the Greenhouse ATS your best choice?

Greenhouse is a great choice for you if you’re a mid-market organization running complex, high-volume hiring processes and are willing to invest time in setup, training, and configuration to support advanced workflows.

But if you’re looking for an easier-to-use ATS that is still robust enough for multi-region hiring and offers faster setup, Tellent Recruitee is a strong alternative worth considering.

On the other hand, if you’re looking for a basic, plug-and-play hiring tool for simpler workflows, both Greenhouse and Tellent Recruitee can feel excessive. In that case, a simpler, lower-cost ATS like JazzHR will make a better fit.

FAQs

How does Greenhouse compare to other ATS?

Compared to other ATS software, Greenhouse stands out for deep customization, support for high-volume, multi-region hiring, and structured workflows for complex recruiting. And in contrast with simpler tools like JazzHR, Greenhouse is more configurable and scalable — making it better suited for growing teams. 

Which companies use Greenhouse ATS?

Mid-market companies running high-volume, multi-stakeholder hiring across regions commonly use Greenhouse. It’s especially popular in tech, healthcare, and professional services among fast-growing organizations with structured recruiting teams that need a customizable ATS to support mature hiring processes and complex workflows. 

Is Greenhouse an HRIS?

No, Greenhouse is not an HRIS. It’s a dedicated applicant tracking system (ATS) that helps teams manage their recruiting and hiring workflows. Greenhouse does, however, integrate with external HRIS platforms to transfer candidate data into HR tools after a hire is made. 

Is Greenhouse an ATS?

Yes, Greenhouse is an end-to-end applicant tracking system (ATS) built to manage the entire hiring process — from job postings and applications to interviews and offers. It’s designed for high-volume, multi-region recruiting with tools for structured interviews, pipeline management, and recruiting analytics. 

What are Greenhouse ATS alternatives?

Popular Greenhouse alternatives include Tellent Recruitee, Lever, Workable, and SmartRecruiters. These tools vary in ease of use, depth of automation, and scalability. Some like Tellent Recruitee prioritize faster setup and simplicity, while others like SmartRecruiters focus on enterprise-level workflows, analytics, and integrations — making the right choice dependent on team size, hiring volume, and process complexity. 

What is the difference between Greenhouse and Workable ATS?

Greenhouse is built for complex, high-volume, multi-region recruiting with deep customization and structured workflows. Workable prioritizes ease of use, faster setup, and built-in sourcing tools for smaller teams. In short, Greenhouse favors control and scalability, while Workable favors simplicity and speed. But if you’re looking for ease of use, in-depth customization, scalability, and implementation speed — all in one — then Tellent Recruitee might just be the ATS worth exploring. 

How well does Greenhouse integrate with other tools?

Greenhouse offers a large integration ecosystem covering HRIS platforms, calendars, job boards, and sourcing tools. However, user reviews report that some integrations require lengthy manual setup and that HR system integrations can feel limited, especially in terms of syncing data between recruiting and core HR systems.